top of page
交流之可能? 在Re:Re:之間

​(for English please scroll down) 

藝術創作的過程,可視為一種創作者個人獨特的工作狀態與經歷;若非與藝術家面對面,則觀者通常難以得知創作過程中的各種想法、轉折變化。這次的”語彙” 展覽,源自於新樂園與荒原藝術空間的邀約與交流,皆嘗試去觸碰在藝術創作的演變過程中,藝術如何被轉化與形塑?

 

在展覽中,新樂園邀請6位藝術家以各自觀點進行獨立創作,而荒原藝術的8位創作者,則採取了定期聚會的Re:Re:方式,在浮洲地區創造出共同經驗、以及相互回覆的各種狀態。

 

荒原聚會的參與者,各自與荒原藝術空間有著不同的、浮動的連結關係。曾美福、吳芊逸是荒原藝術空間的營運者;而芊逸小時候曾居住在浮洲地區,也正因為如此,而選擇將空間地點錨定於此處。太認真(郭柏俞÷佘文瑛)與高登,同為山珍海味工作室的成員,因同樣位於浮洲的地緣關係,從創作交流的話語中,漸漸與荒原產生連結。創作者騆瑜、李奎壁,因曾經參與荒原藝術的交流活動,黃耀陞則是因為奎壁的關係而認識了芊逸。種種看似日常的關係,是否冥冥中牽引著某種必然性,使參展者被連繫在一起?

 

荒原藝術是一個複合式的替代空間,一樓咖啡店的部份,本身即喚起聊天沉思的氛圍。在本次展覽籌備中,即以此作為Re:Re定期聚會的場所,並以駐點的方式,每兩週回到此處 (展覽後期為每週一次) 聊天分享、或共同走訪浮洲地區,進行討論與交流。

 

這樣的聚會,不同於藝術家個人準備展覽的主觀方式,也異於策展人統籌展覽的方式。聚會的約定,形成創作者們會面的契機,開啟從言談中感受彼此思惟、堅持與想像力的途徑。聚會成為一種共同經歷過的參與事實,在過程中使創作者們的生命經驗彼此交疊。

 

荒原藝術的聚會並無預設的主題,而是嘗試從實地走訪、經驗分享、以及交談回覆之間的諸多想像,來捕捉藝術的靈光。如同電子信件的RE:與Re:之間,包含著一種個人的話語思惟,以及靈機應變,在往返中時而嚴肅、時而詼諧的分享、聯繫著多樣性的、或者差異性的想像概念。

 

當聚會的經驗過程,作為一個展覽的實踐方式時,應如何面對創作者們不斷產生的想像或歧義? 哪些想像應該被實現? 哪些想像會停留在想像? 在經歷過提議、反駁、歸零、再提議的一連串過程之後,展覽的實踐方式,最終回歸到那最初的 ”邀請” 本身-也就是創作者透過對其它的參展者發出邀請,透過這個邀請,連繫起這段聚會期間的共同經驗與記憶;並以各自的思惟方式,與參與者共同討論展呈的形式。邀約只要有一人以上願意參與,即可成立-由此而可能自由產出,多樣化的團體實踐與發展樣態。

當聚會的經驗過程,作為一個展覽的實踐方式時,應如何面對創作者們不斷產生的想像或歧義? 哪些想像應該被實現? 哪些想像會停留在想像? 在經歷過提議、反駁、歸零、再提議的ㄧ連串過程之後,展覽的實踐方式,最終回歸到那最初的 ”邀請” 本身-也就是創作者透過對其它的參展者發出邀請,透過這個邀請,連繫起這段聚會期間的共同經驗與記憶;並以各自的思惟方式,與參與者共同討論展呈的形式。邀約只要有一人以上願意參與,即可成立-由此而可能自由產出,多樣化的團體實踐與發展樣態。

 

從荒原聚會過程、與浮洲地區走訪經驗所發展出的邀請,反映出不同創作者之間獨特的思考路徑;同時卻也彼此交錯於私密/公開、回憶/現實、當下/後設等不同面向。彷彿在差異的想像之中,各自開闢起通往一座歧路花園的路徑,卻又在某些時刻中,產生有所默契似的交會。或許這反映著聚會作為展覽實踐過程中,其對於概念的創造、推翻、覆述、融合等種種經驗呈現,並試著去實踐一種交流的可能。

The possibility of communication-
in between Re:Re: ? 

The process of creating arts could be regarded as a kind of personal unique working state and experience of the creator. Without face to face meeting with the artist, the audience could hardly notice all kinds of thoughts and turning points during the creating process. The “Lexicon” originates from inviting exchange between “SLY Art Space” and “Wasteland Art Space”, both of which tried to touch the process in the artistic creation that how art is transformed and shaped.

 

In the exhibition, “SLY Art Space” invited six artists to create independently from their own view points, while the eight artists from “Wasteland Art Space” resort to the “Re:Re:” pattern that artists meet regularly and create mutual experience in Fu-Zhou area, and all kinds of state to reply each other.

 

The participants in the “Wasteland Art Space” meeting have different floating connective relationship with the “Wasteland Art Space”. Zeng Mei-Fu, and Wu Chen- Yi are operators of “Wasteland Art Space”; Wu Chen- Yi lived in Fu-Zhou area when she was little, which is why they select their location there;“Working Hard” (Kuo, Po-Yu ÷ She, Wen-Ying) and KAO DENG-HUEI are members of “Shan Zhen Hai Wei Studio”. Since their studio is also located in Fu-Zhou, from the artistic exchange, they gradually connect themselves with “Wasteland Art Space”. Jhou-Yu and Li.kuei-Pi have once joined exchange activities from “Wasteland Art Space” . Whether those seemingly common relation has any secret inevitability to connect the artists together?  

 

 

“Wasteland Art Space” is a composite alternative space that the café shop at the first floor can arouse the atmosphere of chatting and contemplating. In the preparation of this exhibition, this space is set as a regular meeting place, where they visit once every two weeks (at the end of the exhibition term, they visit every week) in stagnation to chat, share, or visit Fu-Zhou area, which they discuss and communicate.

 

 

This kind of meeting is different from the subjective way of an artist preparing exhibition on his or her own, which is also very different from the way that curator has to arrange all duties in an exhibition. The commitment of the meeting results in the opportunity for them to meet up, opening a path to sense thoughts, perseverance, and imagination from the conversations between them. The meetings become a participating fact that they have mutually gone through, from which their life experience overlaps one another.  

 

 

The Re:Re: meeting in Wasteland Art Space have no presumed theme;instead, they try to catch the artistic inspiration from the field visits, sharing experience, and the imagination among conversation with replies. Just like between the Re: Re: in email, there include personal conversation thinking and quick adaptation to changing circumstances that sometimes serious, but sometimes humorously sharing the imaginary concept linked with diversity or difference.  

 

 

In the experience of the meetings, how to face the non-stop springing out of imaginations and different voices from the creators? Which imaginations should come true? Which should stay in imagination? After experiencing a series process of proposal, argument, second proposal……, the final practice of the exhibition return to the initial “invitation” itself—through the invitation to the other participants they link up mutual experience and memories during the meetings, which is presented in a way that under the creators’ own thinking path, the participants discuss their presentation together. The invitation stands if one or more people are willing to join, from which give birth to diverse group practice and developing shapes.

   

 

From the meeting of “Wasteland Art Space” , and the invitation developed from the Fu-Zhou area field trips reflect unique thinking path among different creators, meanwhile, overlapping each other in different aspect of : private/ public, memories/ reality, now/ meta……etc. Like they are constructing their own path to a crossroad garden in different imagination, while encounter one another as if their minds are in sync. Perhaps this reflects that the meetings in the practice of an exhibition, presents experience of the creation, overruling, restatement, fusion……of concept, and try to realize the possibility of communication. 

bottom of page